Good morning. You’re reading the Up First newsletter. Subscribe here to get it delivered to your inbox, and listen to the Up First podcast for all the news you need to start your day.

Today’s top stories

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent yesterday announced new U.S. economic sanctions on Iran and what he called “its enablers.” The Trump administration has referred to the initiative as an “economic D-Day,” and Bessent has described the actions as an “economic onslaught” targeting Iran’s global financial connections. The Treasury says it has identified networks, facilitators and financial channels that support Iran. The U.S. says it will allow countries time to change their ways before taking action. Here’s what this new round of sanctions could mean after nearly six months of war with Iran — and whether this economic war can do what airstrikes and negotiations couldn’t.

• 🎧 NPR’s Michele Kelemen tells Up First that the U.S. wants to make Iran’s choices clear: Face economic isolation or return to normalcy. Bessent is warning countries that the U.S. is aware of Iran’s methods to evade sanctions and says no entity is beyond the reach of U.S. sanctions. Kelemen says the Trump administration appears to be counting on a regime change to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. In a message to Iranian soldiers, Bessent asked them to consider whether their commanding officers were leading their country to “triumph or ruin.”
• 🎧 The United Arab Emirates was among the first to announce it would cut off commercial trade ties with Iran, but reactions from other Gulf allies have so far been muted, NPR’s Aya Batrawy says. She adds that the U.S. will need more countries to align with Trump’s measures against Iran, because the president wants to crush — not just cripple — its revenue. China is the most consequential country as it is the largest importer of Iranian oil. China’s foreign ministry condemned the latest U.S. measures, calling them “illicit unilateral sanctions without international legal basis.” Iran’s Economy Minister Ali Madanizadeh last night dismissed the U.S. actions, saying that Iran has been preparing for this and has a two-year plan to manage the consequences.

The Supreme Court has given Trump a temporary win in his efforts to restrict mail-in voting. Justices on Monday paused a lower court’s ruling that blocked key parts of an executive order Trump issued in March calling for the U.S. Postal Service to deliver mail-in ballots only to people on lists of U.S. citizens. The lower court’s ruling applied to 23 mainly Democratic-led states and Washington, D.C., that sued the administration. With midterm elections just weeks away, the U.S. Postal Service and other federal agencies will face challenges implementing Trump’s directives.

• 🎧 The fight over mail-in voting is not over, NPR’s Hansi Lo Wang says. The Supreme Court has not ruled on whether Trump’s order is legal. The Justices only ruled that a Boston judge acted prematurely in June by concluding that Trump’s directives exceeded presidential authority under the Constitution. Trump has said he issued his order to prevent illegal voting by non-U.S. citizens, despite numerous studies indicating that such incidents are incredibly rare. Colorado’s Democratic Secretary of State Jena Griswold tells Lo Wang that there’s real concern this order could create chaos for the midterms.

Department of Homeland Security agents secretly recorded meetings held at churches, libraries, restaurants and schools across the Twin Cities during a surge in federal immigration enforcement last winter, according to government documents. The revelation was part of a motion filed in federal court as part of an ongoing conspiracy case against ICE protesters. Agents also infiltrated private group chats and gathered information on community members. Critics argue that while the Fourth Amendment grants the federal government broad authority to gather information, these tactics raise ethical concerns.