A disabled East Village resident with morbid obesity is suing his co-op over new rules he says threaten a parking spot his family has used for decades — as the board moves to sell the lot for residential development.

Steven Andruseaski, 61, is suing Village View Housing Corporation over a new parking agreement he says would give the co-op the ability to boot him from his space in Parking Lot 7, next to his apartment in the seven-building Mitchell-Lama complex just south of Tompkins Square Park.

Weighing about 375 pounds, Andruseaski said he uses a cane and can only walk about 200 feet. He depends on his car — and the nearby parking spot — to get to doctors’ appointments and buy groceries on Long Island.

“It’s hard for me to be mobile because I can’t walk too far and I can’t stand still at all,” Andruseaski told The Post. “If I stand still — my knees, my back, my hips — they just start hurting right away.”

A doctor’s note filed with the Manhattan Supreme Court suit says Andruseaski has been diagnosed with “morbid (severe) obesity” and osteoarthritis in both knees.

Andruseaski said his family has used the parking spot for more than 40 years and that he currently pays $200 a month for it.

The suit comes after Village View gave residents until Aug. 31 to sign a new agreement expanding the circumstances under which they could lose their parking privileges — or face having their cars towed.

Andruseaski claims the agreement violates state human-rights law and is asking a judge to permanently bar Village View from removing his car or denying him access to the parking space. 

His parking fight comes amid a broader battle over Village View’s plan to sell the 110-space Lot 7 for residential development — a connection Andruseaski makes in his lawsuit.

His complaint alleges the co-op plans to sell the lot to a developer and eventually eliminate its parking spaces.

Hundreds of shareholders at the 1,236-unit complex have demanded more transparency about the proposed redevelopment of Lot 7, one of seven parking lots at Village View, and questioned why the board is moving ahead without a shareholder vote.

But the board doesn’t need shareholder approval to proceed, only a green light from the city Department of Housing Preservation and Development.

The co-op received bids for rental developments starting in the mid-$30 million range, Jodi Stein, the board’s attorney in the potential sale, previously told The Post.

Stein disputed that the parking litigation is connected to the lot’s proposed sale.

“The litigation filed by Mr. Andruseaski has nothing to do with the sale of the parking lot,” Stein said in a statement to The Post. “I would avoid conflating these issues, as they are completely separate.”

Kagan Lubic Lepper Finkelstein & Gold, the law firm representing the co-op in Andruseaski’s case, didn’t respond to a request for comment. Neither did Andruseaski’s attorney.

Andruseaski isn’t the only shareholder challenging the new parking agreement at the 110-spot lot.

Sebastian Kot told The Post he filed his own challenge to the agreement, with a hearing scheduled for October.

Kot said residents could lose their spaces under several circumstances, including moving to another apartment within the complex.

“They can also kick you out [of the spot] for basically no reason,” he claimed.

Resident George Jarema claims he is already caught in another provision.

He said he tried to submit succession paperwork for the three-bedroom apartment where he grew up shortly after his mother died in 2022, but management allegedly refused to accept it.

Jarema claimed to The Post the co-op is now using the succession restriction to prevent him from keeping his parking space.

“It’s a little shady, them doing this parking agreement roughly at the same time when it came to light they’re trying to sell the parking lot,” Jarema said.

“It’s my belief that it’s easier for the board and management to take spots away from people to make it easier to sell the parking lot.”