Iran threatens military attacks while US rules out extending temporary cease-fire

DUBAI/WASHINGTON, Aug 17 (Reuters) – Iran will shift to a “fully offensive” military ​posture because efforts to negotiate a permanent end to the war with the US have stalled, a senior Iranian official told Reuters on Monday, as Washington ruled out extending ‌a temporary cease-fire agreement.

Outward progress towards peace talks and a resumption of oil tanker traffic through the strategic Strait of Hormuz has ground to a halt, threatening to extend the conflict that the US and Israel launched with attacks on Iran on February 28.

“Iranian entities must be prepared to escalate tensions in the Strait of Hormuz and wider region, as Iran will be ready to make decisions and take action on difficult decisions,” the Iranian official said, adding that Tehran would conduct a “timely and precise” military ​attack to break the US naval blockade if diplomacy failed.

Iranian-made Zolfaghar missiles are displayed at Azadi Square in Tehran on Aug. 2, 2026. AFP via Getty Images
Dark oil residue collects in shallow coastal waters on Qeshm Island, Iran, on Aug. 13, 2026. AP Photo/Amirhosein Khorgooi

A memorandum of understanding signed in June to end the war had given Iran and the US until Monday to reach a final ​peace agreement.

Signed on June 17, the memorandum set a 60-day time frame for a broader deal on Iran’s nuclear programme and US sanctions.


Follow The Post’s live coverage of President Trump and national politics for the latest news and analysis


The agreement, which declared ⁠the “immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts,” quickly unravelled over a dispute about control of the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow waterway through which a fifth of global oil and liquefied ​natural gas flowed before the war.

Asked by reporters on Monday if the US was seeking to extend June’s interim agreement, President Donald Trump said no. REUTERS

Asked by reporters on Monday if the US was seeking to extend June’s interim agreement, US President Donald Trump said no.

Back channel to IRGC

In one glimmer of diplomacy, media reports said ​Trump had opened back-channel discussions with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, which has become more powerful during the war and controls large parts of Iran’s armed forces and the economy.

Axios, citing two sources with direct knowledge, reported that former Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard spoke with an Iraqi Kurdish leader with close ties to the IRGC, and that through this intermediary the US delivered a message to IRGC commander General Ahmad Vahidi.

Fox News later reported that Trump confirmed ​the report in a telephone interview.

The Trump administration was concerned whether Iranian negotiators across the table actually spoke for the IRGC, Axios said, at a time when Reuters was reporting that Vahidi had become a ​pivotal figure. Vahidi responded that he was aligned with the Iranian negotiators, Axios said.

President Trump and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth (right) salute as a US Army carry team carries the transfer case containing the remains of Sgt. Angel S. Rampersad, on July 22, 2026, at Dover Air Force Base in Dover, Delaware. AFP via Getty Images

“I can’t go into the details of it, but I will say that the conversations between the US government and different areas of the Iranian government at ‌all areas ⁠is probably more robust than it’s maybe ever been,” Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law and special envoy, said in a separate interview with Fox News Channel’s Chief Foreign Correspondent Trey Yingst on Monday.

Trump threatens to bomb Oman

Iran said point 5 of the Memorandum of Understanding gave it the right to manage the strait, which it shares with US ally Oman, while the US rejected that interpretation.

Hostilities resumed as Iran began firing on vessels it said were trying to sail through Hormuz on an unapproved route, and Trump said on July 7 that the pact was “over.”

The Iranian official told Reuters the US must meet the entirety of the MoU’s provisions ​within a few weeks as a precondition for ​further negotiations.

Even as Iran projects resilience in the ⁠war, its leaders are worried that a threat of more economic punishment could increase hardships, reignite unrest and further erode the Islamic Republic’s legitimacy, according to three Iranian officials.

Iran entered the war with high inflation, a weakening currency, energy shortages, sanctions and deep structural weaknesses, and must now contend with damaged infrastructure, disrupted trade, ​lost production and the cost of rebuilding.

Iran has separately been negotiating an agreement on managing the strait with Oman and says they are close ​to a deal.

Vessels transit the Strait of Hormuz off Bandar Abbas in southern Iran on Aug. 10, 2026. AFP via Getty Images

Trump responded to ⁠those negotiations with a threat against the Gulf state, a longstanding US security partner.

“If Oman gets in the way, we’ll bomb the s–t out of them,” Trump told Fox News.

Thousands of people have been killed in the conflict, mainly in Iran and Lebanon. Iran has bombed US military bases and infrastructure in countries including Oman, Jordan, Kuwait, Israel, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia.

Trump warned Americans in a speech at a rally on Friday ⁠to prepare for continued ​high fuel prices as a result of the war.

Benchmark Brent crude oil futures have surged during the conflict, hitting a ​peak of $126 a barrel, roughly 75% above pre-war levels. Brent crude settled more than $2 higher on Monday to $90.87 a barrel.

For Americans who will vote in November congressional elections, gasoline prices have risen above $4 per gallon, up from less than $3 before the war, according ​to the automotive group AAA.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *